The size and sound I might have been able to live with temporarily, but it was the unexpectedly poor quality printing which killed the dream for me. It literally looks and sounds like it stepped right out of the 1980s.īeing on a budget, I was optimistic even after I connected this monster in a make-shift location. In addition to the poor print quality and loudness, I simply have no space for anything this large. I will be returning this one to the store. My old printer went buggy on me, and I thought I might be getting a great deal with this printer. Some color ink is consumed even when you print in black-and-white. Use cartridges within six months of installation. Dont leave the machine with cartridges missing. Replace cartridges right after you remove them. And if you already have the $70 and aren't getting this as a special offer, buy something else. For best print quality, use new Canon brand cartridges (refills may clog the nozzles and wont alert you when its time to replace the ink). If you're that desperate, I'm sure you can find a small simple inexpensive printer for a temporary basis as well. Unless you're in absolutely desperate need of a printer at home till you can afford to shell out $70, don't buy this one. Believe me, the other reviewers weren't exaggerating. I read the reviews before I purchased this, and bought it anyway since it would only be $20. If you've never had a 3-in-1 before, maybe it's sort of cool to have your own copier at home. Yes, there are far superior 3-in-1 printers out there for the same price listed here. Wait till you have $69 to buy something better.
If you simply can't afford to purchase anything else, and you're buying this as a special offer for around $20, save your money. Compared to a NON-LASER 3-in-1 printer I own, this wasn't worth the $20 I paid for it, after the discount for purchasing with a laptop.
0 kommentar(er)
